Did Trump Lose the 2024 Election?
It's a possibility…
Every accusation is an admission. That sounds like the kind of nonsense a narcissistic, abusive partner might say during an argument, but when it comes to fascists, that is part of the grift. To unjustly acquire and concentrate power, you need to divide the people in order to preemptively destroy any bipartisan democratic movement against you. But you also need to simultaneously commit some truly heinous, violent, and degrading acts that, if you don’t justify, could easily create a bipartisan movement designed to eradicate you. The solution? Accuse the other side of the very crimes you want to commit. It creates an “us versus them” narrative by smearing your opponent and contributes to the cult of identity politics that fascism thrives within. It also justifies and reduces the public backlash to your heinous actions in an “I only committed this violent crime to prevent them from doing the same” way. Why do I mention this? Well, the Trump administration has suddenly started attacking Obama. But why? And why now?
Last week, Tulsi Gabbard accused Obama of a “years-long coup against President Trump.” According to her, Obama led an effort to tie Trump to Russia and undermine his 2016 election campaign, which we know is false. Multiple investigations into the 2016 election proved that Russia did meddle with the results, but not by manipulating the voting machines. Instead, they systematically disseminated targeted misinformation that swung voters in Trump’s favour. This is actually quite clever, as it means Russia can openly manipulate an election, get caught, and not undermine the results of said election, as it is the democratic consensus that has been manipulated, not the democratic process. This is why none of Obama’s findings actually undermine the 2016 election, its validity, or Trump’s right to be president, and why he didn’t call for his departure. So, in reality, this is about as far from a “coup” as possible.
However, yesterday (as of writing), Trump was asked some incisive questions about the Epstein files and, in response, doubled down on Gabbard’s deranged claims. He labelled the public’s demand to release the Epstein files a “witch hunt” (which definitely didn’t make him look guilty), then blurted out, “The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold,” and went on to baselessly accuse Obama of treason…
Thankfully, in a move that reminded us of the good old days when politics made even the slightest bit of sense, Obama and his office replied, “Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response.” Oof, what an opener! The statement continued, “But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.”
And Obama is completely right. This is a distraction. In fact, it is a double distraction.
The demand to release the Epstein files is a witch hunt — just one aiming to uncover powerful and influential paedophiles, whether they are part of the right or left. After all, Maxwell isn’t in prison for sex trafficking to nobody.
And as a quick side note: as a society, if we believed women or took their accusations even partially seriously, we wouldn’t need the Epstein files to be released to condemn Trump.
However, this sudden pivot to attacking his old adversaries is such a blatant attempt to divert attention away from the Epstein files while the public and media close in on Trump’s involvement with Epstein and his crimes.
The same day Trump made this baffling shift against Obama, the Wall Street Journal published an article citing credible anonymous senior administration officials who claimed that Pam Bondi informed Trump his name was all over the Epstein files way back in May. This is not surprising at all, and we have known of Trump’s involvement with Epstein for years (read more here). But, with the context of Trump’s crappy cover-up, this revelation paints him as insanely guilty.
And there is another piece of context that is important here: Trump’s supporters have tried to offer him cover. For example, Alex Jones has said that he knows Trump is in the Epstein files, but that he isn’t implicated in any crimes.
Even before becoming president, he repeatedly alluded to the Epstein files being “phoney,” and since taking office, he has once again labelled them a hoax perpetrated by the Democrats to smear him — which is odd, considering the files were collated during his first term, and Epstein’s mysterious death happened while he was in office. It’s almost like he is trying to discredit the files, even before they come out…
Trump has protection from his supporters to release these files, even if they do mildly implicate him. Instead, he and Bondi are repeatedly claiming they can’t release them, as they contain images of child sexual abuse and the identities of victims, even though everyone calling for the files’ release wants these sections to be redacted.
The fact that Trump is so adamantly refusing to release them, despite it being the easiest way to clear his name and having created ample cover even if he is implicated, heavily suggests that these files offer rock-hard evidence tying Trump to Epstein’s crimes.
Let’s also not forget that Trump is currently suing the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion for publishing a birthday card he sent to Epstein for his 50th birthday that implies not only that they were close, but that they were close in that way. So, the fact that the Wall Street Journal, a publication that is lawyered up to the gills, is doubling down with even more potentially slanderous accusations suggests that they have more evidence tying Trump to Epstein than they are letting on.
This is what Trump is desperately trying to distract us from, right?
Well, I’m not so sure. He has given himself presidential immunity and is making serious moves to become a dictator. Sure, if it were revealed he partook in or enabled these horrific crimes, it would seriously damage his reputation and harm his public support, but right now, it wouldn’t necessarily diminish his power.
Fortunately, there is something brewing that could. You see, there is mounting evidence that the 2024 presidential election was heavily manipulated in Trump’s favour, with several election fraud experts raising the possibility that Trump actually lost.
Every accusation is an admission. That is what enables them to do horrific things.
But, like with Epstein, this shouldn’t be a surprise. We know Trump is happy to rig an election. We all heard that telephone call where he begged for an extra 12,000 votes to magically appear out of nowhere, and we can all remember when he instigated an actual attempted coup.
However, multiple bipartisan investigations into the 2024 election have found serious evidence of systematic voter fraud in Trump’s favour.
For example, SMART Elections has discovered that multiple counties in New York had incredibly anomalous down-ballot drop-off rates. Typically, the number of voters for a party decreases from the presidential vote to the Senate vote. But in places like Clarkstown and Rockland, Harris, as a presidential candidate, had significantly fewer voters than the Democratic Senate candidate. The exact opposite of typical voting data. And this can’t be chalked up to misogyny, as the Senate candidate was also a woman. To give you an idea of how anomalous these votes are, in one district, the Democratic Senate candidate won by over 80%, yet the district registered zero votes for Kamala. SMART Elections also found that in some New York locations, the number of people who claim to have voted for Kamala is significantly lower than the final tally.
The Election Truth Alliance found similar evidence in North Carolina and Pennsylvania, two of the most pivotal swing states in the 2024 election. In fact, using complex e-forensics models to detect voter fraud, researchers found that between 25,000 and 225,440 votes in the presidential race were potentially fraudulent, which is more than Trump’s winning margin. In other words, the state could have been fraudulently stolen from Harris. And multiple election security experts have suggested this situation isn’t isolated to North Carolina but appears across almost all the swing states. In fact, these bipartisan charities are often slow and poorly funded, so they may have only discovered the tip of the iceberg. That is why seven of these experts warned Harris to challenge the election outcome and insist on a recount, citing the vulnerability of voter machines and preliminary data that suggested the results had been manipulated.
How did this even happen?
Well, in 2017, computer scientist Alex Holderdam presented the Senate with a paper detailing how every single voting machine can be easily hacked to steal votes and fraudulently turn entire elections. What’s more, he found the results of such attacks would resemble the anomalies found in the 2024 vote data. Watch this excellent video by Scott Carney to find out more.
So, let me spell things out: We know Trump is happy to manipulate elections in his favour and encourage illegal actions to secure his power, because he already did that in 2020. We know that the voting machines used in the US are highly vulnerable to attacks, whether by domestic or foreign parties. Furthermore, we know that the voting data from major swing states not only heavily suggests that it was manipulated but also manipulated enough to change the result of that state and potentially change the outcome of the election in Trump’s favour.
No one is stupid enough not to add one and one together here.
This is why these bipartisan charities are starting to take their findings to court and demanding a recount of the voter receipts, as this could directly prove fraud and create grounds not just for an investigation into how this happened, but a nationwide investigation to find out how far-reaching it was.
Yet, somehow, these groundbreaking, well-researched, well-cited, and valid investigations, and their potential to overturn the 2024 election results, aren’t in the news, and Democrat figures aren’t highlighting them. Why?
Well, in the wake of Trump’s Obama claim, it would just look like tit-for-tat, where both sides are playing equally dirty. And only one side wins when things get dirty.
Trump isn’t just distracting everyone from his apparent involvement with Epstein but also trying to bury the credible evidence that he may not actually have won in 2024. Every accusation is an admission, and right now, Trump is painting a giant “I Am Guilty” sign on his weak orange brow.
Thanks for reading! Don’t forget to check out my YouTube channel for more from me, or Subscribe. Oh, and don’t forget to hit the share button below to get the word out!
Sources: BBC, BBC, The Guardian, BBC, The Guardian, WSJ, ETA, ETA, SMART Elections, SMART Elections, PNAS, SMART Elections, Will Lockett, Scott Carney
And this is why he insisted the 2020 election was stolen when he and everyone knew it was not. This makes it much harder for people to believe that this 2024 election was stolen. the "deep state" indeed.
n is defined as the crime of betraying one's country or sovereign. It typically involves actions such as levying war against the government or providing aid and comfort to its enemies. In the U.S., treason is specifically defined in the Constitution as "only in levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort". This crime is considered one of the most serious offenses and is often referred to as "the highest of all crimes".
CriminalDefenseLawyer.com
+1